BMW X3 vs Volvo XC60 vs Jaguar F-Tempo

0
136

The launch of the brand new BMW X3 marks the tip of a 12 months full of high-profile premium SUVs. We’ve seen the Audi Q5, Alfa Romeo Stelvio and Volvo XC60 all making waves within the section in 2017, however it was the latter that impressed essentially the most, and it’s one of many key vehicles for the brand new X3 to beat.

The Volvo’s upmarket cabin and sensible appears to be like, mixed with a powerful specification checklist and a composed chassis, meant the Swedish mannequin took our 2017 Premium SUV of the 12 months title.

Greatest SUVs and 4x4s 2018

Then there’s the Jaguar F-Tempo, which is one other favorite of ours and was the winner of our coveted Automotive of the 12 months award again in 2016.

It’s the oldest mannequin of the three right here, however it’s  nonetheless very sensible, snug and, as a result of means it drives, a critical contender on this class. So to take residence a win the brand new X3 might want to convey collectively practicality, inside high quality, a cushty journey and interesting dealing with.

That’s fairly a feat to realize, however with the brand new BMW 5 Collection taking a commanding victory in its personal class as nicely this 12 months, the X3, which shares comparable tech, may do the identical. Can it ship? Learn on as we give our definitive verdict…

BMW X3

Mannequin BMW X3 xDrive20d M Sport Auto
Worth £41,380
Engine 2.Zero-litre 4cyl diesel, 187bhp
Zero-60mph Eight.Zero seconds
Take a look at economic system 33.5mpg/7.4mpl
CO2 138g/km
Annual street tax £450

BMW has offered greater than 1.5 million X3s because it first went on sale in 2003, however the earlier second-generation mannequin was beginning to really feel previous. The brand new automobile is a step ahead, and we’re testing the xDrive20d in M Sport trim, which begins at £41,380.

The earlier X3 was all the time a best choice on this class when it got here to driving dynamics, and that hasn’t modified with this new mannequin. The superior new structure means the brand new BMW presents a class-leading journey and dealing with steadiness.

In consolation mode it’s supple sufficient that there’s solely a small distinction between it and the XC60, however it’s extra compliant than the Volvo and offers with mid-corner bumps with extra composure.

The X3’s steering isn’t as fast because the Jaguar’s, and it doesn’t fairly match the F-Tempo’s agile dealing with, however it’s so shut behind and can also be extra snug, so for many consumers the BMW is the higher selection.

Then there’s the efficiency: the BMW’s energy figures match its rivals right here, however in our assessments on the monitor it was considerably faster. From Zero-60mph, it was a second quicker than the XC60 and 1.Four seconds quicker than the F-Tempo, taking simply Eight.Zero seconds.

It’s an analogous story with the in-gear figures: from 30-50mph in fourth the BMW recorded a time of three.Four seconds, simply beating the Jaguar’s Four.6 seconds and the Volvo’s three.7 seconds. It appears faster in the true world as nicely, for the reason that gearbox is nicely matched to the engine, with properly spaced ratios.

This helps increase refinement additional, an space the place the X3 excels as a result of its powertrain is definitely the quietest of the three fashions on the transfer.

Testers’ notes: “The X3’s xDrive system offers reassurance when driving in slippery situations, however the sporty calibration means the set-up helps increase the BMW’s agility, too.”

Volvo XC60

Mannequin Volvo XC60 D4 R-Design Auto
Worth £39,705
Engine 2.Zero-litre 4cyl diesel, 187bhp
Zero-60mph 9.Zero seconds
Take a look at economic system 39.4mpg/Eight.7mpl
CO2 148g/km
Annual street tax £140

The Volvo XC60 is a key rival for the X3 to beat, because it impressed us sufficient in 2017 to say the Auto Categorical Greatest Premium SUV title. Right here we’re testing the two.Zero-litre diesel D4 mannequin in R-Design trim, which prices £39,705.

The BMW and Jaguar ship candy dealing with, however the Volvo feels far more arrange for consolation, though it doesn’t dispose of agility. The adaptive dampers on our automobile meant it was ready to take in bumps on tough roads pretty nicely.

Within the stiffer setting it does really feel harsher than both of its rivals, however the default mode is a pleasant steadiness between agility, composure and luxury. Nevertheless, the R-Design mannequin’s bigger 19-inch wheels do affect this and decrease trim ranges we’ve tried with smaller wheels are extra compliant.

The steering is lighter within the Scandinavian SUV than its rivals, however it’s nicely weighted within the XC60 and it’s sufficient to offer confidence in putting the automobile. It does lag behind its rivals a bit of in the case of dynamic skill and delight.

Nevertheless, on this class it’s not such a difficulty, as a result of house owners can be extra concerned with journey consolation; so it’s a disgrace that the XC60 feels a bit of harsher than the X3 on rougher roads.

The two.Zero-litre diesel engine isn’t any smoother than its rivals right here, though none of our trio’s engines is especially characterful to make use of. They do all supply respectable efficiency, although, and in our assessments the 187bhp Volvo fared fairly nicely in opposition to its rivals.

On the monitor it managed 30-70mph in Eight.three seconds, lots quicker than the Jaguar’s 9.Four-second time, however behind the X3’s Eight.1 seconds. The driving place is snug within the Volvo, though the seats within the BMW and Jaguar are literally much more supportive, plus you get leather-based as commonplace on these vehicles. There’s an excellent degree of consolation on lengthy journeys consequently.

Nevertheless, whereas the transmission is clean and upshifts early, when you rev the motor onerous it’s as loud because the F-Tempo’s engine and never significantly nice to hearken to. The Swedish mannequin’s engine is definitely not as hushed because the X3’s extra refined motor.

Testers’ notes: “The XC60’s inside is an actual step up from its predecessor. It’s not as sporty because the X3, however it’s a match for high quality. Each really feel higher constructed and extra luxurious than the Jaguar.”

Jaguar F-Tempo

Mannequin Jaguar F-Tempo 2.0d 180 R-Sport AWD Auto
Worth £41,330
Engine 2.Zero-litre 4cyl turbodiesel, 178bhp
Zero-60mph 9.Four seconds
Take a look at economic system 37.9mpg/Eight.3mpl
CO2 139g/km
Annual street tax £450

The Jaguar F-Tempo received our 2016 Automotive of the 12 months award because of its spectacular mixture of sharp appears to be like, consolation, refinement and agility. We’re testing the two.Zero-litre diesel AWD mannequin in R-Sport guise, which prices from £41,330.

Though the Jaguar’s engine is the least highly effective right here – the two.Zero-litre diesel has 178bhp, whereas each rivals have 187bhp – it’s really a winner in the case of torque. The motor has a most of 430Nm, which beats the BMW and Volvo by 30Nm, and it’s out there as little as 1,750rpm, which suggests it feels nearly as punchy from behind the wheel as its rivals.

Nevertheless, the engine is coarse and doesn’t really feel as responsive as the wonderful unit within the BMW. At 70mph the F-Tempo is the noisiest automobile right here, too, and when you put your foot down the drone from the engine is much more obvious. The gearbox shifts easily if you want it to, though it’s not as intuitive because the BMW’s transmission.

With plenty of grip and good physique management, the F-Tempo is enjoyable to drive; it’s onerous to imagine a high-riding SUV can deal with in addition to this. It stays composed even on bumpy roads, and luxury doesn’t take an excessive amount of of a success to ship these enjoyable dynamics.

It’s a disgrace it doesn’t have the efficiency to match its rivals provided that the driving expertise is so good in any other case. On the monitor the Jag was slower than the Volvo and BMW in most key efficiency assessments, together with Zero-60mph and 30-70mph, though it did handle to beat its rivals from 50-70mph in seventh gear.

In that take a look at it took Eight.Eight seconds, a tenth quicker than the BMW and half a second quicker than the XC60. It’s the F-Tempo’s heavier kerbweight that dulls the automobile’s efficiency, which is why the Jaguar’s dealing with is all of the extra spectacular.

Testers’ notes: “The Jag is offered with rear-wheel drive at a decrease value, however its rivals are four-wheel drive solely. Take into consideration the place you’ll use the automobile earlier than choosing the additional pushed wheels.”

Verdict

First place: BMW X3

With a category this aggressive, it’s a slender win for the BMW X3. It’s much more snug than the Volvo and practically nearly as good to drive because the F-Tempo. It’s additionally the quickest and essentially the most refined SUV right here, whereas it presents plenty of practicality, the very best high quality cabin and loads of expertise. It could be pricier than its rivals, however the distinction is sufficiently small for the BMW to safe the win.

Second place: Volvo XC60

The XC60 continues to be a best choice within the premium SUV class, however simply loses out to the X3 right here. The XC60 is snug and good to drive, however simply doesn’t have the BMW’s breadth of skill. It does have a top-notch inside on its aspect, and it’s nice worth too, each by way of checklist value and on PCP finance, which is why it finishes forward of the sharper-to-drive F-Tempo on this take a look at.

Third place: Jaguar F-Tempo

It’s clear how tight the race is when the Jaguar finishes in third place. Our 2016 Automotive of the 12 months continues to be the very best automobile on this class to drive, and it has the most important boot of the three. Its sharp appears to be like and powerful residual values are massive plus factors, too, however it falls behind its take a look at rivals for inside high quality, efficiency and worth, as a result of the Jaguar isn’t as nicely outfitted because the XC60 or X3.

Different choices on this class

Mercedes GLC 250d AMG Line

Worth: £41,470
Engine: 2.1-litre 4cyl, 201bhp

In the event you’re after an SUV with journey consolation in thoughts, contemplate the Mercedes GLC. It glides over bumps within the street with ease, particularly when you go for a mannequin on air suspension. The 250d can also be extra highly effective than its rivals right here.

Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2.2 180hp Speciale

Worth: £41,490
Engine: 2.2-litre 4cyl, 178bhp

On the flip aspect, specializing in driving thrills is the Alfa Romeo Stelvio. It’s an all-new mannequin that’s nice to drive, sensible and classy. It’s not as nicely completed as its rivals right here, however presents one thing a bit of sportier.

Figures

BMW X3 xDrive20d M Sport Auto Volvo XC60 D4 R-Design Auto Jaguar F-Tempo 2.0d 180 R-Sport AWD Auto
On the street value/whole as examined £41,380/£48,655 £39,705/£47,190 £41,330/£57,075
Residual worth (after 3yrs/36,000) £21,807/52.7% £21,000/52.9% £23,112/53.9%
Depreciation £19,573 £18,705 £19,218
Annual tax legal responsibility std/increased fee £2,385/£Four,771 £2446/£Four,892 £2,368/£Four,735
Annual gasoline value (12okay/20okay miles) £1,970/£three,284 £1,675/£2,792 £1,697/£2,828
Insurance coverage group/quote/street tax 30/£821/£450 31/£722/£140 29/£730/£450
Price of servicing £399 (three years) £1,Zero29 (three years) £699 (5 years)
Size/wheelbase Four,708/2,864mm Four,688/2,865mm Four,746/2,874mm
Top/width 1,676/1,891mm 1,658/1,999mm 1,667/2,Zero70mm
Engine 4cyl in-line/1,995cc 4cyl in-line/1,969cc 4cyl in-line/1,999cc
Peak energy/revs 187/Four,000 bhp/rpm 187bhp/Four,250rpm 178/Four,000 bhp/rpm
Peak torque/revs 400/1,750 Nm/rpm 400Nm/1,750rpm 430/1,750 Nm/rpm
Transmission Eight-speed auto/4WD Eight-spd auto/4WD Eight-spd auto/4WD
Gas tank capability/spare wheel 60 litres/£190 60 litres/£150 60 litres/£160
Boot capability (seats up/down) 550/1,600 litres 505/1,432 litres 650/1,740 litres
Kerbweight/payload/towing weight 1,750/660/2,400kg 1,832/618/2,400kg 1,775/685/2,400kg
Turning circle/drag coefficient 12.Zero metres/Zero.29Cd 11.Four metres/Zero.32Cd 11.6 metres/Zero.34Cd
Fundamental guarantee/restoration 3yrs (limitless)/3yrs 3yrs (60,000)/3yrs 3yrs (limitless)/3yrs
Service intervals/UK sellers Variable/192 18,000 miles (1yr)/114 21,000 miles (2yrs)/84
Driver Energy producer/seller pos. ninth/21st seventh/16th 12th/13th
NCAP: Grownup/youngster/ped./help/stars 93/84/70/58/5 98/87/76/95/5 93/85/80/72/5
Zero-60/30-70mph Eight.Zero/Eight.1 secs 9.Zero/Eight.three secs 9.Four/9.Four secs
30-50mph in third/4th three.Zero/three.Four secs three.5/Four.6 secs three.Four/three.7 secs
50-70mph in fifth/sixth/seventh/eighth Four.Eight/6.three/Eight.9/15.Four secs 5.9/6.9/9.three/12.5 secs 5.7/7.1/Eight.Eight/15.Eight secs
High pace/rpm at 70mph 132mph/1,650rpm 127mph/1,900rpm 129mph/1,600rpm
Braking 70-Zero/60-Zero/30-0mph 43.9/32.5/Eight.5m 53.Zero/36.Four/11.5m 40.6/31.three/Eight.6m
Noise exterior/idle/30/70mph 66/52/61/69dB 72/51/62/70dB 68/53/64/72dB
Auto Categorical econ. (mpg/mpl)/vary 33.5/7.Four/442 miles 39.Four/Eight.7/520 miles 37.9/Eight.three/513 miles
Govt city/extra-urban/mixed 49.6/56.5/54.3mpg 44.1/54.three/50.4mpg 45.6/60.1/53.3mpg
Govt city/extra-urban/mixed 10.9/12.Four/11.9mpl 9.7/11.9/11.1mpl 10.Zero/13.2/11.7mpl
Precise/claimed CO2/tax bracket 226/138g/km/29% 192/148g/km/31% 195/139g/km/29%
Airbags/Isofix/park sensors/digicam Six/sure/sure/sure Seven/sure/sure/£375 Six/sure/sure/£375
Auto field/stability/cruise management/AEB Sure/sure/sure/£670 Sure/sure/sure/sure Sure/sure/sure/sure
Local weather management/leather-based/heated seats Sure/sure/sure Sure/sure (half)/sure Sure/sure/sure
Met paint/LED lights/keyless entry & go £670/sure/£450 £650/sure/£500 £705/£915/£840
Sat-nav/USB/DAB radio/Bluetooth Sure/sure/sure/sure Sure/sure/sure/sure Sure/sure/sure/sure