Peugeot has efficiently reworked its vary in recent times, with the 3008 and 5008 SUVs standing as the most effective examples of the model’s revamped vehicles. They’re such an enormous step on from their predecessors that each have gained group exams in Auto Categorical throughout their time on sale.
The 5008 took its maiden highway take a look at victory in petrol kind final yr – however whereas petrol is the flavour of the month, diesel will nonetheless make extra sense for a lot of patrons. Those that drive loads of miles in a yr will profit from the gas financial savings these vehicles convey on motorways, whereas a diesel’s torquey energy supply could be helpful for towing and carrying heavy hundreds.
So we’ve lined up the 5008 2.Zero BlueHDi 180 to tackle its key rival: the Skoda Kodiaq, additionally utilizing a 2.Zero-litre diesel engine. We’ve additionally introduced in a wild card within the form of the SsangYong Rexton. That is one other mannequin that has been reworked in its newest iteration, however can the Korean automotive actually match its European rivals? It’s equally priced, so these are the rivals it must match as much as if it desires to steal gross sales.
These seven-seaters aren’t constructed for driving enjoyment, so many patrons will choose the convenience of use that their computerized gearboxes convey. It’s the primary time we’ve put an computerized Peugeot 5008 to the take a look at as nicely, however which of this trio is finest for practicality, economic system and luxury?
|Mannequin:||Peugeot 5008 2.Zero BlueHDi 180 EAT8 GT Line|
|Engine:||2.Zero-litre 4cyl diesel, 175bhp|
|Check economic system:||42.6mpg/9.4mpl|
|Annual highway tax:||£140|
We have been impressed with the handbook petrol 5008 in our first take a look at, however now it’s time to see how nicely this 175bhp diesel mannequin will fare. With an computerized gearbox and 7 seats to match its rivals right here, this model prices £34,390 in GT Line trim.
For many prospects, trip consolation can be a core promoting level of those huge household cruisers – and the 5008 scores very nicely right here. Mushy suspension and an extended wheelbase imply the automotive drives easily on tough roads, and whereas there’s a little bit of physique motion on notably undulating surfaces, it’s managed pretty nicely.
Nonetheless, the gentle set-up additionally signifies that it rolls in corners greater than the Skoda Kodiaq, regardless of the 2 vehicles having the same stage of consolation general. That’s partially right down to the small steering wheel and quick rack. You have to be smoother and extra measured together with your steering inputs than within the different fashions right here to keep away from unsettling the automotive. There isn’t a lot suggestions by the wheel, both, however that’s a criticism you may stage in any respect three automobiles.
The 5008’s 2.Zero-litre engine is the least highly effective on take a look at, though it’s solely 4bhp behind the SsangYong. And since the Peugeot is the lightest automotive right here, at 1,540kg, it carried out nicely in our acceleration exams.
We managed Zero-60mph in Eight.9 seconds, which was six tenths slower than the extra highly effective, four-wheel-drive Skoda, however considerably forward of the heavyweight Rexton; these vehicles took Eight.three seconds and 10.2 seconds respectively.
One of many largest elements right here apart from energy and weight is the gearboxes. The Kodiaq’s DSG is way faster to shift than the 5008’s eight-speed auto, and the SsangYong’s seven-speed auto is glacially gradual.
The Peugeot isn’t as quiet because the Skoda on the transfer, and this spoils cabin refinement. The engine is extra audible and there’s additionally extra wind noise.
Testers’ notes: “4-wheel drive isn’t out there on the 5008. As an alternative, a Grip Management perform means that you can change the steadiness management settings to assist off highway. It really works comparatively nicely and can be sufficient for many wants.”
|Mannequin:||SsangYong Rexton 2.2 ELX auto|
|Engine:||2.2-litre 4cyl diesel, 179bhp|
|Check economic system:||32.6mpg/7.2mpl|
|Annual highway tax:||£140|
The SsangYong Rexton is a brand new giant SUV with so much to show, and this seven-seat variant in ELX trim with an computerized gearbox begins at £34,995. That value pits it in opposition to the 2 proficient European fashions on this take a look at, so does the Korean 4×4 have what it takes to attain extremely right here?
The Rexton has a way more European really feel on the within, however the old school pick-up-style chassis below the pores and skin means it merely can’t compete with both of those rivals for trip or dealing with. The SsangYong by no means settles down, with the chassis consistently jiggling round beneath you.
It feels notably out of its depth on tough surfaces on the town, as a result of the low-speed trip is disappointing. It doesn’t enhance an enormous quantity as you get on to sooner roads, however it’s nearly acceptable at motorway speeds. That’s in distinction to its rivals right here, each of which trip very easily in all circumstances by comparability.
Even the gentle suspension set-up doesn’t assist; whereas the automotive doesn’t jolt into potholes, there’s a number of physique roll in corners and numb steering.
A hefty kerbweight means the Rexton isn’t very agile, and it additionally hampered its efficiency in our acceleration exams. It took 10.2 seconds to go from Zero-60mph and, because of its slow- shifting computerized transmission, 10.5 seconds to cowl 30-70mph by the gears. That was considerably behind the 5008 and Kodiaq.
Though its trip and efficiency are poor, the SsangYong does have a snug driving place, and the two.2-litre diesel feels punchy sufficient out on the highway. With 420Nm of torque out there from as little as 1,600rpm, there’s efficiency out there while you want it, and it makes an honest tow automotive, too, as we’ve discovered from the Rexton we’re working on our fleet.
The gearbox is easy sufficient while you’re driving usually, and whereas it feels overwhelmed for those who push a bit more durable, that’s not what the seven-speed auto was designed for. It was one other huge issue within the Rexton’s efficiency on the observe, as a result of the modifications are fairly gradual; it’s evening and day subsequent to the swift DSG gearbox within the Kodiaq. Nonetheless, the SsangYong does function a correct switchable 4×4 system, so it’s the most effective off-roader of the bunch.
Testers’ notes: “The Rexton feels unwieldy on British roads resulting from its sheer dimension, however poor visibility and gradual steering don’t assist issues. A minimum of there’s an ordinary rear digital camera to assist with parking.”
|Mannequin:||Skoda Kodiaq 2.Zero TDI 190 DSG 4×4 SE L 7 seat|
|Engine:||2.Zero-litre 4cyl diesel, 187bhp|
|Check economic system:||39.3mpg/Eight.6mpl|
|Annual highway tax:||£140|
When the Skoda and Peugeot final met in petrol kind, the 5008 took victory. However the 2.Zero TDI 190 DSG SE L Kodiaq we’ve lined up right here has gained all of its group exams thus far. It prices from £34,800 in seven-seat guise, to match its opponents on this take a look at.
Our Kodiaq’s 2.Zero-litre diesel could be present in a variety of different VW Group fashions, and it’s simply as sturdy right here as in another software. It’s essentially the most highly effective engine on this take a look at, with 187bhp; the Peugeot and SsangYong have 175bhp and 179bhp respectively.
The Kodiaq usually outperformed its rivals in our exams on the observe, taking Eight.three seconds to go from Zero-60mph, partially because of the quick-shifting DSG gearbox and robust traction off the road, boosted by that four-wheel-drive system.
The SsangYong might solely document kickdown figures, as a result of it refuses to carry on to gears in handbook mode, however the Skoda was sooner from 30-50mph in third than each rivals.
In increased gears, the Peugeot began to tug away, although; the Kodiaq took 16.four seconds to go from 50-70mph in seventh, whereas the lighter Peugeot took simply 9.6 seconds.
The Kodiaq is essentially the most composed automotive of the three when cornering rapidly, and whereas the steering doesn’t have loads of really feel, it’s exact sufficient to position the large Skoda on the highway. Even on 19-inch wheels, the Kodiaq rides nicely, absorbing tough highway surfaces and greater potholes, though at low velocity you may really feel them thud into the cabin greater than within the Peugeot.
The driving place is essentially the most comfy right here, however it’s pretty upright and people with lengthy legs would possibly discover that they relaxation in opposition to the steering column. Because the Skoda’s engine produces its torque low down within the rev vary, with 400Nm at 1,750rpm, it doesn’t have to carry on to gears, and this helps with refinement. Driving at a relaxed tempo, diesel rattles are firmly within the background.
Testers’ notes: “Practicality is among the Skoda’s strongest factors, however it’s not all about that. It is a high all-rounder. We love its refinement, composed dealing with and upmarket inside as nicely.”
First place: Skoda Kodiaq
It’s a detailed end between the Kodiaq and 5008 right here, as a result of each are high seven-seat SUV selections. However on this kind, the quieter engine, easy and quick-shifting DSG field and decrease month-to-month funds imply the Skoda takes victory. It’s simply as sensible and can be inexpensive to run, plus the very fact it has four-wheel drive and a few additional towing capability over its rival helps, too.
Second place: Peugeot 5008
Whereas the 5008 is trendy, good to drive and economical, it finishes a detailed second right here. It makes extra sense in additional inexpensive Attract trim, as you get the identical nice practicality and luxury, in addition to a lot of the identical equipment. It’s essentially the most spacious automotive of the three and delivers respectable efficiency, however it wasn’t by a sufficiently big margin to steal victory from the Kodiaq.
Third place: SsangYong Rexton
The Rexton has come a good distance with this most up-to-date mannequin, however at this value it’s arduous to justify subsequent to its European rivals. The uncomfortable chassis means it’s additionally the least agile selection, whereas it’s not as environment friendly and it’s much less spacious than its rivals, regardless of being larger than each on the surface. It’s nicely outfitted, however doesn’t look nice worth compared with the Kodiaq and 5008.
Different choices for related cash
New: Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace
Engine: 2.Zero-litre 4cyl, 187bhp
The Tiguan Allspace makes use of the identical platform and engine because the Kodiaq, so it scores extremely on dealing with and refinement. It’s not fairly nearly as good worth because the Skoda, however high quality is great and it comes with loads of equipment in SE Navigation trim.
Used: Land Rover Discovery Sport
Engine: 2.Zero-litre 4cyl, 178bhp
Go for a used mannequin and your choices embrace premium SUVs such because the Discovery Sport. This seven-seater lacks slightly area however is refined and nice on and off highway. We discovered a high-spec HSE 2.Zero TD4 with simply 14,000 miles for £31,500.
|Skoda Kodiaq 2.Zero TDI 190 DSG 4×4 SE L 7 seat||Peugeot 5008 2.Zero BlueHDi 180 EAT8 GT Line||SsangYong Rexton 2.2 ELX auto|
|On the highway value/complete as examined||£34,800/£34,800||£34,390/£38,735||£34,995/£36,400|
|Residual worth (after 3yrs/36,000)||£16,377/47.1%||£14,427/42.Zero%||£15,496/44.three%|
|Annual tax legal responsibility std/increased price||£2,374/£four,748||£2,Zero48/£four,096||£2,455/£four,911|
|Annual gas price (12okay/20okay miles)||£1,816/£three,026||£1,675/£2,792||£2,189/£three,648|
|Insurance coverage group/quote/highway tax||21/£457/£140||23/£485/£140||29/£533/£140|
|Servicing prices||£279 (2yrs)||£12.99pcm (3yrs)||£747 (3yrs)|
|Engine||4cyl in-line/1,968cc||4cyl in-line/1,997cc||4cyl in-line/2,157cc|
|Peak energy/revs||187/three,500 bhp/rpm||175/three,750 bhp/rpm||179/four,000 bhp/rpm|
|Peak torque/revs||400/1,750 Nm/rpm||400/2,000 Nm/rpm||420/1,600 Nm/rpm|
|Transmission||7-spd DSG auto/4WD||Eight-spd auto/fwd||7-spd auto/four wheel drive|
|Gasoline tank capability/spare wheel||60 litres/restore equipment||56 litres/restore equipment||70 litres/restore equipment|
|Boot capability (2/5/7-seat modes)||270/765/2,005 litres||167/952/2,042 litres||N/A/649/1,806 litres|
|Turning circle||11.6 metres||11.2 metres||11.Zero metres|
|Fundamental guarantee (miles)/restoration||3yrs (60,000)/3yrs||3yrs (60,000)/1yr||5yrs (limitless)/1yr|
|Driver Energy producer/vendor pos.||sixth/fifth*||17th/ninth*||N/A|
|NCAP: Grownup/little one/ped./help/stars||92/77/71/54/5 (17)||86/85/67/58/5 (16)||N/A|
|Zero-60/30-70mph||Eight.three/Eight.Zero secs||Eight.9/Eight.four secs||10.2/10.5 secs|
|30-50mph in third/4th||three.2/6.four secs||three.three/four.four secs||four.2 secs (kickdown)|
|50-70mph in fifth/sixth/seventh/eighth||6.four/9.2/16.4s/N/A||5.6/6.7/9.6/14.Eight secs||6.6 secs (kickdown)|
|Prime velocity/rpm at 70mph||129mph/1,800rpm||134mph/1,600rpm||115mph/1,800rpm|
|Auto Categorical econ (mpg/mpl)/vary||39.three/Eight.6/519 miles||42.6/9.four/525 miles||32.6/7.2/502 miles|
|Precise/claimed CO2/tax bracket||193/151g/km/35%||178/129g/km/30%||232/218g/km/37%|
|Airbags/Isofix/park sensors/digital camera||Seven/y/y/£385||Six/sure/sure/sure||9/sure/sure/sure|
|Auto field/lane maintain/blind spot/AEB||Y/£910^/£910^/y||Sure/sure/sure/sure||Sure/no/no/sure|
|Clim ctrl/cruise/leather-based/heated seats||Sure/sure/£310/sure||Y/y/£1,990/£560||Sure/sure/sure/sure|
|Metallic/LEDs/keyless go/pwr tailgate||£575/sure/sure/sure||£525/y/£350/£750||£600/no/sure/no|
|Nav/digi sprint/DAB/linked apps||Sure/no/sure/sure||Sure/sure/sure/no||Sure/no/sure/no|
|Wi-fi cost/CarPlay/Android Auto||No/sure/sure||Sure/sure/sure||No/sure/sure|