FIA race director Charlie Whiting says the governing physique is contemplating aligning System 1 driver punishments extra intently with the implications of their actions.
There was some controversy after the latest French GP when Sebastian Vettel obtained a five-second penalty for hitting Valtteri Bottas on the first nook, ruining the Finn’s race by sending him to the again of the sphere with a broken automotive.
Some drivers like Lewis Hamilton prompt that the penalty handed to the German was not adequate, despite the fact that he was additionally badly delayed.
Whiting says that the stewards should not supposed to contemplate the implications for the opposite events concerned in an incident, however prompt that they could achieve this sooner or later.
“The stewards do not usually have a look at the implications of the accident,” he defined. “Though in equity it most likely performs a bit unconscious half.
“Let’s simply say Vettel had continued with none downside, I feel the stewards could have thought that is not honest, he is ruined Valtteri’s race, it is clearly his fault, they usually could have thought barely otherwise.
“Nevertheless it’s not a aware factor to say, ‘He is OK, he is not.’
“Or as an instance had it been the opposite means round, as an instance Valtteri continued, Vettel had induced the accident, however do you have to truly penalise him in addition to the penalty he is already received? Self-punishment if you happen to like.
“It is one thing that we’re discussing. It might open the door to one thing that we’re not anticipating, though some might argue that it’s kind of extra widespread sense. So it is one thing that we’re at present discussing with the stewards.”
After France, some additionally questioned why Vettel hand been handed a five-second penalty, whereas Max Verstappen obtained 10 seconds for hitting the German in China.
Whiting mentioned the distinction was that the latter incident occurred in the course of the race.
“I feel first nook incidents, and even first lap incidents, are checked out by a barely totally different pair of eyes.
“You settle for among the issues that occur on the primary lap that you simply may not settle for 10 laps later, for apparent causes.”
Whiting additionally pressured that the previous file of drivers shouldn’t be thought-about when a penalty is assessed.
“Earlier races should not taken into consideration. That is what the factors system is for. That is a reality. That is one of many cornerstones of the stewards’ decision-making course of.”
The consistency of determination making is now pushed by a system known as the Race Watch Stewards Evaluate.
Launched at the beginning of 2016, it sees all incidents investigated since then collated with video proof and particulars of the end result in a single on-line useful resource, to which all FIA stewards have entry.
This permits them to check particulars of what occurred at races at which they didn’t officiate, and to return to these incidents on race weekends when one thing related comes up.
“Each steward has entry to this method. We’ve got common conferences of the chairman of the stewards with the intention to undergo the incidents and see if there’s something that may be discovered from it. It is replace for them instantly after each race.
“The stewards can go to any incident and see precisely what the choice was and what the explanations have been and what the penalties have been. That is all an try to attempt to make issues extra constant.
“The entire concept is that the stewards are ready look again in a short time. Just like the incident at the moment, when Vandoorne’s automotive was launched relatively unsafely in entrance of the Ferrari, they have been in a position to look again at earlier incidents of that.
“There was one in 2016 I feel with Lewis, so it was OK, that was the penalty then, related incident, identical penalty. That is the precept, anyway.”